YAKOV KROTOV
POPES AND ICONS
Venerating icons is a trade-mark of Eastern Christianity. Venerating
popes is a trade-mark of Western Christianity (at least until 16th
c.)
Veneration of icons was an object of immense struggle in 8th c.
Byzantine emperors and bishops opposed it. Icon is a symbol, "bridge
between sky and earth". But there are a lot of symbols in any religion.
Middle Ages is the epoch of symbols, and the sense of Middle Ages
can be determined as an attempt to build the City of God with symbols
on earth.
Icon is a unique type of symbol. It is out of control of all earthly
powers. Kings and bishops can control any sides of religious life:
sacraments, education, charity. Only icon is out of control. Anyone
can make an icon and venerate it without any permission, and the
icon will be a symbol of direct connection with Heavens for this
human, whether priests or ceasars enjoy it or not.
The same can be said about a Pope. Due to primacy, which includes
independence from any secular powers (even Emperor) and even from
Ecumenical council, he is a symbol of Christ, unique in his independence
among other numerous symbols. People can control synods, bishops,
learning, they can control anything except Pope.
Icons and popes have been defended by monks. In the East, when
all bishops agreed to prohibit icons, monks defended them. In the
West, monks with each century have been most active supporters of
Pope�s primacy in the Church against the isolationist and nationalist
politics of bishops.
The independence of icons and Popes makes them both very disturbing
element for earthly powers. Eastern rulers tried to exterminate
icons as an object of direct personal appeal to Christ, Western
rulers on the same grounds tried to exterminate Popes. This is natural.
The mystery is why certain rulers venerated icons and improved Pope�s
primacy, although this contradicted to the spirit of Caesar�s domination.
The reason is that even Caesar is a human being. He personally can
believe in icons or Pope although this undermines the political
system which he rules. Political system tends to be totalitarian,
but human nature of its leaders (not to mention subjects) opposes
to totalitarianism.
Icons occupy in Eastern mentality place which Popes occupy in Western
mentality. I hope that this observation can help to Eastern Orthodox
understand Catholics (as it helped to me), to get a flash of sympathy
to the most hatred (for Easterners) part of Catholic psychology.
Venerating icons and popes is the result of one and the same psychological
and theological need, only forms are different. The difference is
one more manifestation of basic difference between West and East.
Sometimes this difference is explained as the difference between
legalistic world-view of Romans and Eastern mysticism. Westerners
are more interested in administration, Easterners in theology. I
think it is more precise to say that West and East express one and
the same ideas through different language: West prefers the language
of humanity, inter-personal relations, East prefers the language
of Divinity, relations between humans and God.
I also hope that this conception can help to those Westerners who
made an upheaval against Pope�s primacy: Protestants. Their upheaval
only put the Bible on the place of the Pope. Eastern Orthodox and
Catholics are as reluctant to feel the meaning of the Bible to Protestants
as Protestants are reluctant to feel the meaning of icons to Eastern
Orthodox or Pope�s primacy to Catholics.
The problems with icons, popes and Bibles begin in two cases. First,
anyone can perverse symbol to idol. Icons can be objects of idol-worshipping
to Eastern Orthodox, popes to Roman Catholics and Bibles to Protestants.
Only grace can save from such a perversion, not elimination of icons,
popes, Bibles. Second, Second, any virtue is good to the point of
aggression against other virtues. It is good to venerate icons,
sin begins when icon-venerator begins to criticize papacy or Protestantism
as heresy. All too often defenders of Popes or Bibles aggressively
rejected Eastern Orthodoxy as "barbarous."
|