Yakov Krotov

WITNESSING UNITY OF THE CHURCH

Personal remarks. I am Russian. In 1974 I became Christian. I was converted from atheism, which was a natural worldview for a youngster in the Communist country. I was baptized in the Russian Orthodox Church, but from the beginning I believe and feel Christ is one for all Christians. Now I understand that I have very few like-minded persons among my co-believers. I cannot agree with any Christian who thinks that outside his own denomination there are only heretics.

For many years I study history and theology of the Church and ecumenical movement. I’ve been acquainted with all models of ecumenical contacts.

I cannot agree with "cheap ecumenism" -- tendency to diminish problems of Church unity. I think clericalism and triumphalism are poisoning modern ecumenism. It is necessary to make some new efforts to return to the right way and to move forward. I write what follows to find those who share my opinions for mutual support with sympathy, prayers, deeds.

1. Unity is present in the Church. Church divided is not a church at all. For non-Christians this sounds ridiculous: they see that Church is divided. There is a simple decision to say that this is an illusionary division, that Church is one as a tree with its branches, that walls between Christians don’t raise to skies, that divisions are non-religious (cultural, national) and therefor secondary. This simple decision is the "cheap ecumenism."

There is also "cannibalistic ecumenism", which states that Church is one, and this one Church the the Church of a speaker: Roman Catholic or Russian Orthodox, and all other "Christians" are heretics. Cheap ecumenism was born to oppose such cannibalistic ecumenism and is justified by such opposition.

Unity of the Church cannot be reached or proved. Unity of the Church is a matter of faith and will always remain such, because always there will be some people calling themselves Christian and opposing other Christians, whether majority (like hundred years ago) or minority (like now, I hope). We must witness unity of the Church as we witness Christ, primarily by our personal effort.

2. The problem is not to build a bridge but to understand that their is no river. Christian unity must oppose secular views on Christianity. Many crucial Church words  have been perverted. Terms "Catholic," "Orthodox" and others received non-religious sense. For many people the main problem is how to unite "Roman Catholic" and "Eastern Orthodox", "Western" and "Eastern" Christianity. The words "Catholic" and "Orthodox" are used then to designate cultural entities. Unity of the Church is understand as unity of different national and cultural traditions.

In Russia unbeliever can state that he is "Orthodox" ("pravoslavny" or "Russian Orthodox’), because he follows Russian cultural traditions. For many Eastern Orthodox Roman Catholics can be Christians, but cannot be called "Orthodox." For many Roman Catholics "Eastern Orthodox" can never be thought of as "Catholics." But then Christians adopt non-Christian understanding of these words. The problem is that "Roman Catholic" and "Eastern Orthodox’ depict the same Church reality.

It is senseless to try to "unit" Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, because they are one. It is necessary to explain why they are synonimous. "Bridgebuilding" between Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox makes not much more sense than building of the bridge on one shore of the river. If we are Christians we are not separated. This makes witnessing on our unity and Christiniaty not easier, but harder. We must witness not only about Resurrection, but also explain that secular understanding of Christianity as federation of cultural traditions is wrong.

3. Membership in the Church is personal, not a collective one. For 2000 years Christians adopted non-Christian view on religious life and community as primarily a union of "households", super-personal entities as "land," "country," "nation". Ecumenical movement began as a dialogue of personalities but very quickly became a dialogue of organizations, Church authorities. Wait until Church leaders finish negotiations. But negotiations will never finish if only leaders will be active! Indeed, any forceful conversion (proselitism) must be forbidden, but personal choice must receive full acknowledgement of all sides — of the side which is receipient of a new member, and of the side which "losses" its member. There must be no chattering about "renegades." To hunt after someone in order to convert is bad, but to shut doors for converts to come and leave is equally bad.

4. Ecumenists must witness to both sides. Modern ecumenism is mainly meeting of Protestants with Eastern Orthodox Churches. It is also meeting of former and present state Churches (Anglican, Lutheran, Greek, Russian Orthodox), and Baptist or Evangelical are excluded from this meeting. What is worst of all, such meeting to the large extent is silent "friendship against" Roman Catholic Church. But for witnessing unity of the Church meeting of Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodoxy is a primary task.

Witnessing unity of the Church means communicating several ideas both to Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox.

Message to Eastern Orthodoxy includes appeal to recognize Orthodoxy of Catholicism, to stop urging from Catholics abdication from their "new" dogmas.

Message to Roman Catholics includes appeal to recognize that Eastern Orthodoxy is not only a "rite," that it is a variety of true spiritual and theological traditions absolutely equal to the Western tradition.

 
    Return